India Justice Report 2025

Context: India Justice Report 2025 was released recently. It has revealed that with a national average occupancy rate of more than 131%, Indian jails face extreme overcrowding and are battling multiple health challenges.

India Justice Report (IJR) 2025

Published by:

  • Tata Trusts

  • In collaboration with various civil society organisations and data partners

Objective:

  • To track and assess State-wise performance across four pillars of the justice system:

    • Police

    • Judiciary

    • Prisons

    • Legal Aid

Methodology:

  • Based entirely on official government data

  • Evaluates performance using key indicators, such as:

    • Budget allocation: Financial resources dedicated to justice delivery

    • Human resource availability: Adequacy of judges, police personnel, legal aid providers, etc.

    • Infrastructure: Availability and quality of physical and digital infrastructure

    • Workload: Caseload per judge, pendency rates, staff-to-population ratios, etc.

    • Gender diversity: Representation of women in the justice system workforce

Coverage:

  • Includes all 36 States and Union Territories of India

I. Issues with the Prison System in India

1. Severe Overcrowding

  • National average occupancy rate: Over 131%, indicating serious overcrowding.

  • Projected inmate population by 2030: Estimated to reach 6.8 lakh.

  • Expected prison capacity by 2030: Only 5.15 lakh, far short of projected needs.

  • 2012–2022 trend:

    • Inmate population grew from 3.8 lakh to 5.7 lakh (approx. 50% rise).

    • Prison capacity increased only from 3.4 lakh to 4.3 lakh (just 27% rise).

  • Uttar Pradesh: Has the most overcrowded prisons in the country.

  • Delhi: Alarmingly, 91% of prison inmates are undertrials, not yet convicted.

2. Public Health Crisis

  • Medical staff shortage:

    • 43% vacancies in positions for Medical Officers.

    • Doctor-to-prisoner ratio: 1:775, far exceeding the recommended 1:300 (Model Prison Manual).

  • Data gaps:

    • Lack of comprehensive data on inmates with disabilities, whether pre-existing or acquired during incarceration.

3. Mental Health Crisis

  • Severe shortfall of mental health professionals:

    • Only 25 psychologists/psychiatrists available for 5.7 lakh inmates.

    • Ratio: 1 per 22,929 inmates (vs. benchmark of 1 per 500).

  • Widespread absence of services:

    • 25 States/UTs lack any provision for correctional mental health professionals.

4. Inadequate Prison Expenditure

  • Spending per prisoner (2022–23): ₹44,110 annually.

    • An increase from ₹38,028 in 2021–22.

    • Still insufficient given the rising number of inmates and the complexity of their needs.

II. Issues with Policing in India

1. Low Representation of Women

  • Less than 1,000 women hold senior police positions across India out of a total 20.3 lakh personnel.

  • No State or Union Territory has fulfilled its own reserved quotas for women in police forces.

2. Infrastructure Gaps

  • 17% of police stations still lack CCTV surveillance.

  • Almost 30% of police stations do not have Women Help Desks, limiting support for gender-based crimes.

3. Resource Allocation

  • Per capita police spending: ₹1,275 — the highest among all four pillars (Police, Judiciary, Prisons, Legal Aid).

  • Civil police personnel ratio: 1 officer per 831 people, reflecting inadequate staff for growing population demands.


III. Issues with the Judiciary

1. Vacancies and Pendency

  • Uttar Pradesh: Over 50% of High Court judge positions remain vacant.

  • Gujarat: Leads in High Court judge and staff vacancies.

  • Bihar: 71% of trial and district court cases have been pending for over 3 years, reflecting serious case backlog.

2. Judiciary Spending

  • Per capita judiciary spending: Only ₹182 per annum.

  • No State allocates more than 1% of its total budget to the judiciary — revealing chronic underfunding.


IV. Issues with Legal Aid

1. Budgetary Constraints

  • Per capita legal aid spending: A mere ₹6 annually — the lowest among the four pillars.

  • Raises concerns about accessibility and quality of free legal services for marginalized communities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to top