“Divided Waters: The Punjab-Haryana River Sharing Dispute”

Context: Tensions escalated between Punjab and Haryana over the Bhakra Beas Management Board’s (BBMB) decision to release an additional 4,500 cusecs of water to Haryana.

Bhakra-Nangal Project – Key Subpoints

  1. Historical Background

    • One of the earliest post-Independence river valley development projects.

    • Originally conceived in the 1910s.

  2. Structure and Location

    • Comprises Bhakra Dam in Himachal Pradesh and Nangal Dam in Punjab (10 km downstream).

    • Nangal Dam is an extension of the Bhakra Dam, controlling releases into the Nangal Hydel Channel.

  3. Administrative Evolution

    • Initially under the Punjab government before the state’s reorganization.

    • After the 1966 Punjab Reorganisation Act, the Bhakra Management Board was formed to oversee the project.

  4. Renaming and Expansion (1976)

    • Renamed the Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB).

    • Took on additional responsibility for Beas River projects:

      • Beas-Sutlej Link Project (Pandoh Dam)

      • Pong Dam (both in Himachal Pradesh)

  5. Role in Water Distribution

    • BBMB allocates water annually among Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, and Delhi, based on monsoon forecasts.

    • Current allocations (as of the latest year):

      • Punjab: 5.512 million acre-feet (MAF)

      • Haryana: 2.987 MAF

      • Rajasthan: 3.318 MAF

Reasons Behind the Current Dispute

  1. Haryana’s Demand

    • Requested an additional 4,500 cusecs of water for drinking purposes, citing acute shortages in Hisar, Sirsa, and Fatehabad districts.

  2. Punjab’s Objection

    • Opposed the request, highlighting low water levels in key reservoirs (Bhakra, Pong, Ranjit Sagar) due to scant Himalayan snowfall.

    • Warned that any extra release would compromise its own irrigation and drinking water needs.

  3. BBMB Decision

    • Despite Punjab’s opposition, the majority of BBMB states (Haryana, Rajasthan, Delhi) supported the release.

    • Punjab rejected the directive, calling it “unprecedented” and “illegal”, and refused to open the additional sluice gates.

  4. Legal Escalation

    • In response, Haryana filed a case in the Supreme Court under Article 131, seeking enforcement of its water entitlement.


Way Forward

  1. Establish a National Water Commission

    • Conduct real-time water audits.

    • Create a science-based and transparent allocation system.

  2. Reform BBMB

    • Include independent hydrological experts.

    • Ensure transparent operations and consensus-based decision-making.

  3. Promote Interstate Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

    • Develop alternative resolution platforms to address issues before approaching the judiciary.

  4. Adopt Climate-Adaptive Water Planning

    • Use weather forecasts and real-time dam data to assess actual water availability.

    • Implement flexible, equitable sharing frameworks based on current conditions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to top